| INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NOTICE Global Cavitation Group Holdings has process patent applications in progress covering the oil-water separation and hydrophobic contaminant removal mechanisms described in this document. Operators and engineering contractors interested in commercial deployment, licensing, or joint development arrangements are invited to contact Global Cavitation directly. |
|---|
1. Executive Summary
Produced water is the oil and gas industry’s largest waste stream by volume — globally estimated to be well over 250 million barrels per day, substantially exceeding the volume of oil produced. Managing it efficiently, cost-effectively, and in compliance with increasingly stringent discharge and reinjection standards is a defining operational challenge across all producing regions. Conventional treatment technology — chemical demulsifiers, coalescing plate separators, dissolved air flotation, filtration — was designed for a different era of regulatory expectation and water chemistry complexity.
G-Cav™ vortex-induced multistage hydrodynamic cavitation addresses the produced water challenge through two independently validated and complementary mechanisms. The first is sub-micro flotation — the simultaneous breaking of oil-water emulsions by cavitation implosion and concentration of hydrophobic contaminants at the liquid surface through Gibbs adsorption interfacial scavenging, without chemical addition. The second is sequential Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) treatment — a proprietary three-step flow path in which ozone, in-situ generated oxidants, and G-Cav™ hydrodynamic cavitation act in sequence to precipitate dissolved metals, destroy bacteria, and convert a high-fouling brine into injection-compliant water in a single pass.
Both mechanisms have been validated in field testing on Permian Basin produced water under real operating conditions. The results — 64.6% TOG removal in a single pass for oil separation, and 96.9% iron removal with 100% aluminium elimination for AOP metal treatment — represent performance that no membrane-based or chemical-only treatment system has matched in equivalent produced water conditions.
| 64.6% TOG removed, single pass — oil-water separation, Permian Basin |
96.9% Iron removed — sequential AOP, Permian Basin, Sep 2025 |
100% Aluminium eliminated — same single-pass AOP treatment |
Zero External chemicals added — in-situ chemistry from brine chlorides |
|---|
2. The Produced Water Challenge
Produced water from oil and gas extraction is not a single fluid — it is a highly variable, complex aqueous mixture whose composition reflects the geology of the formation, the type of hydrocarbon extracted, and the chemicals injected during drilling, completion, and production operations. What produced water streams share is that they are difficult to treat: high salinity inhibits conventional coagulation and flocculation chemistry; stable oil-water emulsions resist gravity separation; dissolved metals — iron, aluminium, barium, strontium — precipitate when conditions change, plugging injection wells and fouling equipment; and the regulatory expectations for what constitutes acceptable discharge or reinjection quality are tightening across all producing jurisdictions.
In the Permian Basin — one of the world’s most prolific oil-producing regions — produced water volumes already beyond 2.5 to 3 barrels per barrel of oil produced and are rising as plays mature. Managing this volume economically is a defining constraint on Permian production economics, and the industry is actively seeking treatment solutions that reduce cost, reduce chemical inputs, and extend the reuse fraction of produced water in hydraulic fracturing operations.
The specific chemistry of Permian Basin brine — extremely high salinity (sodium levels commonly above 50,000 ppm), extreme iron loading (50–150 ppm dissolved iron), aluminium and silica scaling precursors, and residual hydrocarbons in stable emulsion — defeats most conventional treatment technologies. Membrane systems clog. Chemical treatment at this salinity is expensive and ineffective. Gravity separation cannot address emulsified fractions. G-Cav™ was specifically tested against Permian Basin brine under field conditions precisely because it is the hardest available test of the technology.
3. Oil-Water Separation: Sub-Micro Flotation
The G-Cav™ oil-water separation mechanism operates through two simultaneous physical processes generated by a single hydrodynamic cavitation event — no chemical addition required, no membranes to clog, no residence time beyond the transit through the unit.
3.1 The Dual Mechanism
Cavitation Emulsion Breaking
Stable oil-water emulsions in produced water are sustained by naturally occurring surfactants and emulsifying agents adsorbed at the oil-water interface. These interfacial films prevent droplet coalescence and resist gravity separation indefinitely. Cavitation implosion within the G-Cav™ successive implosion chambers generates transient high-energy pressure events that mechanically disrupt these interfacial films — without requiring the chemical demulsifiers that add cost and create secondary water quality problems. The liberated oil droplets associate with the larger microbubbles co-generated by the cavitation process and rise rapidly to the liquid surface under buoyancy, forming a consolidated, skimmable layer.
Gibbs Adsorption Interfacial Scavenging
Simultaneously, the nanoscale bubble population generated by G-Cav™ cavitation creates an enormous total gas-water interfacial area throughout the bulk liquid — approximately 1.7 million square metres per 20 litres of injected gas at nanoscale bubble diameters. At every point on this interface, the Gibbs adsorption isotherm operates: surfactant molecules spontaneously migrate from the bulk liquid to the bubble surfaces. As free surfactant concentration in the bulk decreases, bulk water surface tension rises, progressively expelling any remaining hydrophobic contaminants — residual oil, organic compounds, surface-active agents — toward the liquid surface for skimming.
The two mechanisms are mutually reinforcing: as surfactants are stripped from the bulk by Gibbs adsorption, the emulsifying capacity of the remaining water decreases, reducing re-emulsification of cavitation-liberated oil. The separation is self-reinforcing over recirculation time.
3.2 Field Validation: Permian Basin Single-Pass Result
The oil-water separation mechanism was validated in a field test on produced water from the Permian Basin on 26 September 2025. A submersible pump feeding a G-Cav™ reactor with nitrogen injection treated produced water in a single pass — no recirculation, no residence time, no chemical addition.
| Sample Point | Sample ID | Total Oil & Grease | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Influent | WC250926-002 | 570.0 ppm | Baseline |
| Single Pass Effluent | WC250926-001 | 202.0 ppm | 368 ppm removed — 64.6% reduction in one pass |
Visual confirmation was immediate: a thick, consolidated layer of oil formed instantaneously on the surface of the receiving vessel, confirming that both the emulsion-breaking buoyancy mechanism and the Gibbs adsorption concentration effect were operating simultaneously. The material available for skimming was high-concentration and coherent — not dispersed foam — indicating complete and rapid phase separation.
| This result was achieved in a single pass — the residence time of the water in the treatment unit was the transit time through the reactor, a fraction of a second. In a continuous recirculating system with residence time measured in minutes, performance improves progressively with each pass. The single-pass result is the floor of performance in a continuous configuration, not the ceiling. |
|---|
3.3 The Membrane-Free Advantage
The dominant alternative technology for produced water oil removal at fine droplet sizes is membrane-based separation — ultrafiltration membranes, tubular membranes, and ceramic membrane systems. These systems achieve high removal efficiency in clean water but face a fundamental operational challenge in produced water: fouling. Produced water’s combination of high iron content, oil, scaling minerals, and suspended solids causes rapid membrane fouling, requiring frequent cleaning, chemical dosing, and ultimately membrane replacement. In high-iron, high-salinity Permian Basin brine, membrane systems have been demonstrated to fail operationally within weeks of deployment.
| G-Cav™ contains no membranes, no diffusers, and no clog-prone components. The cavitation chamber operates through flow-driven pressure dynamics — it has no surfaces that accumulate fouling deposits in normal operation. Independent engineering evaluation has confirmed G-Cav™ operational superiority over membrane-based nanobubble systems in direct comparison testing on contaminant-rich produced water streams. |
|---|
3.4 Frac Water Reuse Economics
Produced water treated to remove oil and grease while retaining its high salinity is directly valuable for hydraulic fracturing reuse. High-salinity water — specifically, water with sodium levels above 30,000–50,000 ppm — is preferred for fracturing operations because it prevents clay swelling in the formation, which would reduce permeability. Desalinating produced water to achieve this reuse standard is unnecessary and counterproductive; maintaining salinity while removing the fouling agents is the objective.
4. Sequential Advanced Oxidation Process: Metal Removal and Brine Remediation
The separation of dissolved metals — primarily iron, aluminium, and silica — from produced water is a different challenge from oil removal, requiring oxidative chemistry to convert dissolved metal ions into filterable precipitates. Iron at 83.7 ppm in the dissolved form does not settle; once oxidised to insoluble ferric hydroxide it can be filtered. The challenge is achieving this oxidation rapidly, completely, and without fouling the treatment equipment in the process.
The Global Cavitation sequential AOP process addresses this through a precisely engineered three-step flow path validated in the Permian Basin Test 2 field trial. The sequence is not arbitrary — the order of operations is critical to operational stability, and understanding why is essential to understanding what makes this process work.
4.1 The Three-Step Sequential Process
The critical engineering insight of the sequential process is that gas injection must occur while metals are still dissolved — before precipitation begins. Once iron precipitates as ferric hydroxide solids, any injection equipment downstream will clog. The sequence is therefore designed to protect itself:
| STEP 1 OZONE INJECTION VIA MAZZEI INTERFACE Ozone gas is introduced into the raw produced water stream through a Mazzei venturi injector upstream of any precipitation. The operational logic is deliberate: injecting while metals are fully dissolved prevents the injector from fouling with precipitated solids — the injector sees clean brine, not particulate-laden slurry. The ozone creates a stream of microbubbles that begin initiating oxidation potential throughout the water volume, starting the conversion of dissolved Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺. |
|---|
| STEP 2 IN-SITU CHLORINE PRODUCTION The ozonated water enters a proprietary chlorine reactor that exploits a property unique to high-salinity produced water: the extreme chloride content of the brine (Permian Basin brine commonly contains 80,000–120,000 ppm total dissolved solids, predominantly as sodium chloride) is converted to free chlorine (Cl₂ / HOCl) by the applied electrochemical energy. No external chlorine is added — the oxidant is generated from the brine’s own chemistry. This creates a dual-oxidant environment (O₃ + Cl₂) that drives rapid iron oxidation. The combination is substantially more effective than either oxidant alone: ozone oxidises Fe²⁺ rapidly but incompletely at high iron loading; the in-situ generated HOCl provides sustained oxidation capacity without the logistical cost of chemical chlorine supply. |
|---|
| STEP 3 G-CAV™ HYDRODYNAMIC CAVITATION — COMPLETION STAGE The chemically active, dual-oxidant stream is forced through the G-Cav™ unit. The successive implosion chambers deliver cumulative cavitation energy that drives the oxidation reactions to completion — converting all remaining dissolved Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺ and precipitating both iron and aluminium as insoluble hydroxide flocs that are immediately filterable. The G-Cav™ cavitation also generates the hydroxyl radicals (•OH) that provide additional oxidative power beyond what ozone and chlorine alone achieve, including destruction of any residual bacteria and oxidation of organic contaminants. |
|---|
| The sequence is the system. Injecting gas before precipitation protects the injection equipment. Generating chlorine in-situ from brine chlorides eliminates chemical supply logistics. G-Cav™ as the final stage drives the reaction to completion and handles the most challenging conditions — the high-solid, high-oxidant stream — using equipment that has no membranes or clog-prone components to protect. |
|---|
4.2 Field Validation: Permian Basin Test 2 Results
The sequential AOP process was validated on high-salinity Permian Basin produced water (post oil separation) on 26 September 2025. The raw influent presented extreme treatment challenges: 83.7 ppm dissolved iron — a concentration that rapidly precipitates to plug injection wells — and 20 ppm aluminium contributing to silicate scaling and sludge.
| Analyte | Pre-Treatment (ppm) | Post-Treatment (ppm) | Removal | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium | 20.0 | 0 | 100.0% | ELIMINATED |
| Iron | 83.7 | 2.6 | 96.9% | MAJOR REDUCTION |
| Phosphorus | 5.551 | 0.769 | 86.1% | SIGNIFICANT |
| Silicon | 16.0 | 11.0 | 31.2% | MODERATE |
Matrix Stability — Salinity Retention Confirmed
| Parameter | Pre-Treatment | Post-Treatment | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium | 53,429 ppm | 56,617 ppm | +3,188 ppm (minor evaporation — not chemistry) |
| Calcium | 3,651 ppm | 3,900 ppm | +249 ppm (minor evaporation) |
| Water pH | 7 | — | Neutral — no acid-base disruption |
The salinity retention data confirms that the sequential AOP process acts as a selective oxidant — it removes fouling agents while leaving the brine’s core chemistry intact. The slight increase in sodium and calcium concentration is attributable to minor evaporation during the field test, not to any treatment chemistry effect. The treated brine’s salinity profile is fully compatible with hydraulic fracturing reuse standards.
| The process converted a high-fouling fluid that would plug injection wells within days into a stable, injection-compliant brine — in a single pass, without adding any external chemicals, and without any membrane or filtration equipment that could itself become a fouling failure point. |
|---|
4.3 The Green AOP Alternative: H₂O₂ / Fenton Chemistry
The in-situ chlorine step requires high-chloride brine — a feature of Permian Basin produced water but not universal across all producing regions. In low-chloride formations, fresh-water-flood produced water, or jurisdictions with strict restrictions on organochlorine by-products (Zero-AOX discharge zones), a modified process chemistry is available that achieves equivalent metal removal performance without chlorine.
The alternative chemistry exploits the dissolved iron already present in the produced water as a Fenton’s reagent catalyst — using the problem as part of the solution:
Modified Step 2: Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) is dosed into the ozonated stream, creating a peroxone system (O₃ + H₂O₂) that generates hydroxyl radicals even at the lower pH typical of produced water.
G-Cav™ activation:
Clean chemistry: The only chemical inputs are ozone (which decomposes to oxygen) and hydrogen peroxide (which decomposes to water and oxygen). The effluent contains no chlorinated by-products — it is suitable for direct environmental discharge or for reuse in Green Hydrogen production systems where chloride contamination would be problematic.
| HYPOTHESIS / PILOT OPPORTUNITY The H₂O₂/Fenton alternative has been validated as a theoretical process design supported by established AOP chemistry. Its specific performance parameters in produced water matrices have not yet been measured in a controlled field trial. Operators in the UAE and other low-chloride or Zero-AOX regions are invited to discuss a structured pilot program to generate region-specific performance data. |
|---|
5. CO₂ and Gas Dissolution for Injection Water Management
Beyond oil removal and metal treatment, gas dissolution into produced water and injection water represents a third application class where G-Cav™ provides measurable operational value. The ability to dissolve gases into water at greater than 99% transfer efficiency — temperature-independently, without membranes, and in produced water chemistries that defeat conventional diffuser systems — is directly applicable to several injection water management challenges.
5.1 CO₂ Dissolution for pH Control and Scale Prevention
Carbonate scaling in injection wells and production tubing is a significant operational cost in water flood and EOR operations. As produced water is reinjected, changes in pressure and temperature cause calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) to precipitate, restricting flow and requiring expensive chemical scale inhibitor programs or mechanical cleanout. Dissolving CO₂ into injection water reduces pH, shifting the carbonate equilibrium toward the soluble bicarbonate form and preventing CaCO₃ precipitation:
CO₂ has substantially higher natural water solubility than oxygen — approximately 1.7 g/L at 20°C versus 0.04 g/L for O₂, a factor of approximately 40. At the G-Cav™ operating gas-to-water ratio of approximately 5% or more for CO₂ injection (compared to 1.5–2% for oxygen), and with greater than 99% transfer efficiency, the dissolved CO₂ concentrations achievable in a single inline pass are sufficient to produce measurable pH reduction in most injection water chemistries. Suction-driven gas injection means no external CO₂ compression is required for the dissolution step itself — CO₂ from a supply cylinder or from on-site capture is drawn into the cavitation chamber by the pump-generated pressure differential.
5.2 The Membrane Contactor Alternative — and Why It Fails in Produced Water
The conventional technology for gas dissolution into produced water is the membrane contactor — a hollow-fibre membrane module through which gas and liquid are brought into contact on opposite sides of the membrane, allowing dissolution without bubble formation. Membrane contactors achieve good gas transfer efficiency in clean water but face the same fundamental challenge as all membrane systems in produced water: fouling. The combination of dissolved iron, oil, silica, and scaling minerals in produced water coats membrane fibres rapidly, reducing gas transfer efficiency and eventually requiring replacement.
G-Cav™ achieves gas dissolution through flow-driven cavitation physics and chemistry — there are no membranes, no hollow fibres, and no surfaces that accumulate fouling deposits. In the produced water environments where membrane contactors fail within weeks, G-Cav™ continues operating without performance degradation. This is the direct competitive advantage for CO₂ dissolution applications in produced water contexts.
5.3 Application Scope: Where G-Cav™ CO₂ Dissolution Is Competitive
It is important to define the application boundary precisely. G-Cav™ CO₂ dissolution is competitive and appropriate in the following applications:
Water flood pH management: Dissolving CO₂ into water flood injection streams to reduce pH and prevent CaCO₃ scaling in injection wells and near-wellbore formation.
Produced water pH correction: Adjusting pH of produced water prior to reinjection to prevent carbonate precipitation during reinjection at formation pressure and temperature.
Saline aquifer CO₂ sequestration support: Dissolving CO₂ into injection water for mineral trapping sequestration programs — accelerating CO₂ mineralisation in the formation by delivering CO₂ in fully dissolved rather than free-gas form.
WAG water leg conditioning: Treating the water leg of water-alternating-gas injection programs to maintain consistent gas dissolution in the water phase.
G-Cav™ CO₂ dissolution is not applicable to supercritical CO₂ injection for miscible EOR — that application requires compression infrastructure to deliver CO₂ as a supercritical fluid at reservoir pressure, which is an entirely different engineering problem. The G-Cav™ platform addresses water-phase CO₂ dissolution, not supercritical injection.
6. The Complete Platform: Reinjection Compliance in a Single Pass
The most significant commercial proposition in the G-Cav™ oil and gas capability is the combination of the separation and AOP mechanisms into a single sequential treatment platform that converts high-fouling produced water to reinjection-compliant brine in one continuous flow path — without external chemicals and without membrane equipment.
6.1 The Reinjection Challenge
Produced water reinjection (PWRI) is the preferred disposal and reuse option for produced water in most jurisdictions — it avoids surface discharge, returns water to the subsurface, and in water flood operations contributes to reservoir pressure maintenance. But reinjection has its own quality requirements: water with excessive suspended solids, dissolved iron, or residual oil clogs the injection well face, reduces injectivity, and in the worst cases causes permanent formation damage that cannot be reversed.
Typical reinjection quality targets for the primary parameters addressed by G-Cav™ treatment are: total oil and grease below 10–20 ppm, dissolved iron below 5 ppm, aluminium below 2 ppm, and total suspended solids below 10 ppm. The Permian Basin Test 2 results — 2.6 ppm residual iron (from 83.7 ppm), 0 ppm aluminium (from 20 ppm), and post-treatment TOG consistent with the single-pass oil separation result — meet or approach these targets in a single pass.
6.2 Integrated Treatment Flow Path
| Treatment Stage | Mechanism | Parameters Addressed |
|---|---|---|
| G-Cav™ Oil Separation(Sub-Micro Flotation) | Cavitation emulsion breaking + Gibbs adsorption scavenging — oil and hydrophobics to surface | |
| Mazzei Ozone Injection | Ozone introduction while metals still dissolved — oxidation initiation, equipment protection | |
| In-Situ Cl₂ Production | Drives rapid iron oxidation; provides bactericidal capacity | |
| G-Cav™ AOP Completion | Cavitation drives oxidation to completion; •OH radicals from cavitation chemistry | |
| Filtration (post-G-Cav™) | Removal of precipitated metal hydroxide flocs — now filterable solids | TSS reduction to reinjection-compliant levels |
| The complete treatment sequence — oil separation followed by sequential AOP metal removal — addresses the full suite of reinjection compliance parameters in a single continuous flow path. The only external input is ozone and electrical power for in-situ chlorine production. No chemical supply logistics, no membrane replacement program, no secondary waste stream beyond the skimmed oil and the metal hydroxide filter cake. |
|---|
7. Deployment Configurations
G-Cav™ produced water treatment systems can be specifically or generally designed for field deployment in the operational environments of oil and gas production — remote well pads, offshore platforms, and centralised water management facilities — without requiring permanent civil infrastructure or specialist installation teams.
7.1 Mobile Skid & Modular Configurations
The complete three-step sequential process — ozone injection, in-situ Cl₂ reactor, and G-Cav™ unit — is deployable on a portable skid that can be positioned on a well pad and connected to existing production flow lines. The Permian Basin field trial used a low quality multistage submersible pump feeding the G-Cav™ unit directly, with the ozone and Cl₂ components upstream in the flow path. The entire assembly is easily truck-transportable and can be repositioned between well pads as treatment requirements change. This mobility is a significant operational advantage in shale plays where produced water volumes and composition change rapidly as wells decline.
7.2 Centralised Water Management Facility
For operators managing produced water from multiple wells through a central disposal or reuse facility, G-Cav™ units are installed inline on the receiving flow lines at the facility. Multiple units in parallel accommodate peak flow volumes; the system scales with throughput by adding units without modifying the surrounding infrastructure. The oil separation and AOP treatment steps can be co-located at the central facility or distributed — oil separation at the well pad to reduce transfer volumes, AOP metal treatment at the central facility prior to reinjection or disposal.
7.3 G-Cav™ Product Range for Oil and Gas
| G-Cav™ Model | Flow (L/hr) | Flow (bbl/day) | O&G Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| G-Cav-3 | 3,000 | ~450 | Single well pilot, small pad testing |
| G-Cav-5 | 5,000 | ~755 | Small pad, pilot AOP validation |
| G-Cav-10 | 10,000 | ~1,510 | Single well production, mobile unit |
| G-Cav-15 | 15,000 | ~2,265 | Small multi-well pad |
| G-Cav-30 | 30,000 | ~4,530 | Mid-scale pad, centralised facility inlet |
| G-Cav-60 | 60,000 | ~9,060 | Large pad, centralised facility |
| G-Cav-90 | 90,000 | ~13,590 | High-volume facility, major operator |
| G-Cav-100 | 100,000 | ~15,100 | Regional water management facility |
All G-Cav™ units are constructed in 316L marine-grade stainless steel, rated for the pressures and fluid chemistries typical of produced water service. Units contain no membranes, no diffusers, and no components that require replacement due to fouling. Maintenance requirements are equivalent to standard pump servicing.
8. Regulatory and Operational Context by Region
| Region | Primary Challenge | G-Cav™ Application | Chemistry Variant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Basin, USA | Extreme iron loading, TOG compliance for disposal/reuse, water volume management | Oil separation + sequential AOP metal removal + frac water reuse | In-situ Cl₂ from high-chloride brine |
| UAE / Middle East | Zero-AOX discharge zones, CO₂ injection for EOR, water injection quality | Green AOP for metal removal + CO₂ dissolution for water flood pH management | H₂O₂/Fenton — no chlorinated by-products |
| North Sea / Europe | Zero liquid discharge targets, offshore space constraints, strict TOG limits | Compact skid oil separation, AOP for reinjection compliance | Either variant depending on produced water chloride content |
| Australian offshore | MARPOL compliance, minimal chemical footprint, remote operations | Chemical-free oil separation for overboard discharge compliance | Sub-micro flotation, no chemical addition |
| Kazakhstan / Central Asia | High metal content, remote logistics, reinjection quality | Sequential AOP metal removal, mobile deployment | In-situ Cl₂ or H₂O₂ depending on water chemistry |
9. About Global Cavitation Group Holdings
Global Cavitation Group Holdings Pty Ltd is an Australian technology company headquartered in Cairns, Queensland. The G-Cav™ vortex-induced multistage hydrodynamic cavitation platform is a patented system with field-validated performance in produced water treatment across the Permian Basin, with active commercial engagement with major oil and gas operators including ADNOC, ConocoPhillips, and Shell. The company’s technology has been independently validated in direct comparison testing against leading membrane-based nanobubble systems, confirming performance superiority in contaminant-rich produced water environments.
Global Cavitation works with operators, engineering contractors, and environmental consultants to design produced water treatment solutions tailored to specific well chemistry, regulatory requirements, and operational constraints. Pilot program design, mobile unit deployment, and technology licensing arrangements are available across all producing regions.
Technical Note on Evidence Status
Oil-water separation performance (64.6% TOG reduction, single pass) and sequential AOP metal removal performance (96.9% iron, 100% aluminium) are drawn from laboratory-confirmed field test results conducted on Permian Basin produced water on 26 September 2025, with sample chain of custody IDs WC250926-001 and WC250926-002. The H₂O₂/Fenton Green AOP chemistry is a proposed process design supported by established AOP literature; its specific performance parameters in produced water matrices have not yet been measured in a controlled field trial. CO₂ dissolution performance is inferred from the validated oxygen transfer efficiency data and CO₂ solubility properties; direct produced water CO₂ dissolution trials have not yet been conducted. Global Cavitation Group Holdings presents all field-validated data accurately and distinguishes hypothesis-level claims clearly.
Talk to Global Cavitation about your application
The performance of any gas-transfer, flotation or water-treatment system depends on site-specific chemistry, flow conditions and process objectives. Global Cavitation can help evaluate whether G-Cav™ technology is suitable for your application and identify the most practical integration pathway.
For technical information, pilot testing discussions, licensing opportunities or project-specific assessments, contact the Global Cavitation team.
Phone: +61 7 4028 3830
Email: info@globalcavitation.com
Address: 26 Donaldson St, Manunda, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia
Contact: Speak with Global Cavitation